Intel Raptor Lake processors will cross the 6GHz limit

With Intel Raptor Lake processors, Intel will leave the 6GHz limit behind for the first time, and will also start pushing 8GHz levels again for overclocking enthusiasts.
 Intel Raptor Lake processors will cross the 6GHz limit
READING NOW Intel Raptor Lake processors will cross the 6GHz limit

Intel, which opened an important area for AMD Ryzen processors due to the problems it experienced in productivity for a period, is slowly making plans to take it back. The company, which stepped up with Alder Lake, will clinch it with Raptor Lake.

Intel Raptor Lake details

The Intel Raptor Lake processor family, which is expected to be released at the end of this year or early next year, will include models that go above 6GHz for the first time. The first candidate for this will be the Intel Core i9-13900K processor.

Intel Raptor Lake graphics performance revealed

Added 6 days ago

Raptor Lake processors, which will also offer DDR5-5600MHz support, will carry Intel over the 8GHz overclocking band after a long time. The Intel Core i9-13900K ES processor succeeded in entering the list dominated by the AMD FX 8000 and 9000 series.

Raptor Lake architecture brings 8-15 percent performance increase in single core and 30-40 percent performance increase in multi-core compared to Alder Lake architecture. It will also seek market share against 3D Ryzen processors, especially with its high cache capacity. Possible processors of the Raptor Lake series and their assigned cache values ​​are as follows:

  • Intel Core i9 K-Series (8 Golden + 16 Grace) = 24 cores/32 threads/68 MB
  • Intel Core i7 K-Series (8 Golden + 8 Grace) = 16 cores/24 threads/54MB
  • Intel Core i5 K-Series (6 Golden + 8 Grace) = 14 cores/20 threads/44 MB
  • Intel Core i5 S-Series (6 Golden + 4 Grace) = 14 cores/16 threads/37 MB
  • Intel Core i3 S-Series (4 Golden + 0 Grace) = 4 cores/8 threads/20 MB
  • Intel Pentium S-Series (2 Golden + 0 Grace) = 4 cores/4 threads/10 MB

Comments
Leave a Comment

Details
228 read
okunma11066
0 comments